Most Read
Most Recent
- Towards the Depths of History:Reflections on Rewriting the Hi…
- The Dual Vision of Zixue and Its Implications for Contemporary…
- A New Interpretation of “The Dao That Can Be Said, Is Not the…
- Imagery and Forms of Creation by the Sages: A Chinese Version …
- Body/Soul Monism and the Establishment of the Life Subject
- The Mind-Body Problem and the Philosophy of Qi
- The State’s Capacity for Good Governance: The Logic behind th…
- Towards the Depths of History:Reflections on Rewriting the Hi…
- The Dual Vision of Zixue and Its Implications for Contemporary…
- A New Interpretation of “The Dao That Can Be Said, Is Not the…
- Imagery and Forms of Creation by the Sages: A Chinese Version …
- Body/Soul Monism and the Establishment of the Life Subject
- The Mind-Body Problem and the Philosophy of Qi
- The State’s Capacity for Good Governance: The Logic behind th…
Avoiding “Drawing Conclusions That Shouldn’t Be Drawn”: Identification and Credibility in Social Science Research
China Social Science Review
No.3, 2021
Avoiding “Drawing Conclusions That Shouldn’t Be Drawn”: Identification and Credibility in Social Science Research
(Abstract)
Pang Xun
As a unique mapping of empirical information and research topics based on theoretical assumptions, identification is the fundamental task and central work of empirical research in the social sciences. Social sciences are undergoing two major changes: the data revolution and the identification revolution. The data revolution makes “possible” almost everything that was “impossible,” while the identification revolution casts doubt on the credibility of these “possibilities,” questions the cost of making every piece of research into a “possibility,” and emphasizes the cleanness and transparency of theoretical assumptions. This calls for the establishment of a “design-driven” empirical research paradigm with strict credibility standards. In some areas not yet reached by the identification revolution, the opportunities brought by big data are accompanied by the emergence of such problems as a lack of credibility in research, a disconnect between theory and empirical evidence, excessive quantification, etc. In the era of big data, raising identification awareness and strengthening identification strategy design in social science development; improving the credibility of empirical research, bridge theory and empirical evidence; and using data and technology in an appropriate manner are tasks of pressing and far-reaching significance.