Sentencing Recommendations, Anchoring Effect and Fairness in Criminal Justice—An Empirical Study Based on a Sample of 520 Sentences in K City

By / 10-30-2018 /

Social Sciences in China, 2018

Vol. 39, No. 3, 2018

 

Sentencing Recommendations, Anchoring Effect and Fairness in Criminal Justice—An Empirical Study Based on a Sample of 520 Sentences in K City

(Abstract)

 

Lin Xifen and Ma Yong

 

The anchoring effect is a powerful and widespread cognitive phenomenon in the decision-making field. Our quantitative analysis of a sample of 520 sentences indicates that the sentencing recommendation of the public procuratorate has a marked influence upon the court’s sentencing judgment. That is, whether we are investigating the freedom penalty, the fine penalty or the term of probation imposed by the judge, we find that the anchoring effect does exist. In addition, a change in the court conviction or in the trial sentencing circumstances and the availability of a defense lawyer may weaken the anchoring effect of the procuratorate’s sentencing recommendations. As a form of cognitive bias, the presence of the anchoring effect in the area of sentencing further highlights the necessity of applying analyses based on legal realism to the field of criminal justice in China; and at the institutional level, it demands that judges adopt corresponding arrangements to ensure the impartial exercise of discretion.

 

Keywords: sentencing recommendations, anchoring effect, discretion, judicial fairness