The 10,000th China-Europe freight train of 2023 departs from Yiwu in south China’s Zhejiang Province to Madrid, Spain, on July 29. The train services have grown into an exemplar of win-win cooperation and common prosperity globally. Photo: CFP

---

“An economy that has high growth in its gross domestic product does not imply that it is developing. China, on the other hand, has known how to maintain a balance between growth and development in its strategy,” said Ruvislei González Saez, a senior research fellow from the Research Center of International Policy, Cuba, in a recent interview with the CSST. González further highlighted Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era surpasses the vision of Chinese modernization, as it delves into the realm of global modernization with a focus on mutual benefits for humanity.

Uniqueness of Chinese modernization 

González said that the fundamental value of China’s modernization experience lies in its ability to adapt to its own national conditions. Transformations of China’s modernization have occurred in all sectors, setting China apart from the rest of the world. 

In terms of politics, González pointed out that China stands as the only country with a socialist socio-political system whose political party system differs from capitalist nations with two-party or multi-party systems, as well as from one-party socialist systems. The Chinese experience promotes the leadership of the CPC while also supporting the existence and cooperation of other parties, which are organized under the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference.

Economically, external support through foreign investment played a crucial role in its early stages, González continued. Presently, China has shifted its focus towards self-reliance and independent efforts in its economic development. This approach has resulted in remarkable progress, driven by a socialist market economy that has become a reference for other socialist experiences. 

China’s distinctive modernization journey has also involved the implementation of significant initiatives, such as the establishment of Special Economic Zones, González added. Notably, China’s modernization efforts have been distinguished by the challenges posed by its vast population and the need to implement a step-by-step modernization effort from east to west, given different socioeconomic conditions and natural endowments across regions.

González further emphasized that Chinese modernization differs significantly from Western modernization. While Western nations primarily prioritize economic development, often neglecting fundamental social issues, Chinese modernization integrates both material transformation and spiritual development. 

Promoting global modernization

Regarding Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, González highlighted that President Xi Jinping contributes relevant elements with his thinking to the modernization of China. These contributions are rooted in the extraction of resources from Chinese tradition and ancestral values, as well as the emphasis on development and transformations guided by the rule of law. Furthermore, Xi’s thought emphasizes the importance of persistently establishing laws based on scientific principles.

Under the thoughtful leadership of President Xi Jinping, China has been actively reshaping not only the patterns and behaviors governed by international rules, which have traditionally been dominated by major Western capitalist countries, but also the perspectives of countries in the Global South.

“Xi’s thinking is at odds with that of Western leaders,” said González. The latter tends to focus on the pursuit of justifications for warmongering and conflicts, ignoring the benefits of cooperation and its crucial role in preserving the human race.

Commenting on the Global Development Initiative (GDI), the Global Security Initiative (GSI), and the Global Civilization Initiative (GCI), González said that the three initiatives constitute a path towards a world of shared, mutual benefits. Together they form an alternative to the current international order, placing greater emphasis on the participation of nations from the Global South. 

Though the initiatives were proposed by China, they constitute global commons because they promote the construction of a world of greater equity, rationality, and multipolarity, in which the benefit is for all parties, González said. 

He emphasized each initiative has its own intrinsic value. The GDI aligns with the United Nations’ Global Goals for 2030, providing support and reinforcement to nations at risk of not meeting these goals within the designated timeframe.

The GSI promotes the peace of nations within the United Nations system and advocates nuclear non-proliferation. Despite attempts by some Western nations to misrepresent its meaning, the initiative actually promotes non-interference in the internal affairs of states, and promotes respect and cooperation to maintain regional and global peace. As González pointed out, countries that criticize this initiative are the same ones promoting the arms race and contributing to conflicts and coup attempts worldwide. With the GSI, China promotes international cooperation in fields such as counter-terrorism, combating transnational organized crime, disaster relief, climate change and public health, so as to make a strong contribution to responding to non-traditional security threats.

The GCI acknowledges and promotes the common values of humanity while respecting the diverse cultures of different peoples. In this sense, it encourages the protection of cultures in the world, González said.

All these initiatives have global significance and promote balance, which should be embraced and supported rather than criticized. The essence of these initiatives is rooted in humanistic values and addresses the genuine needs of the contemporary world, rather than serving the interests of a minority, González concluded. 

Edited by CHEN MIRONG